|
I will watch the rest of this season, if everything turns out good, then I'll be unbelievably overjoyed but if it turns out bad, then I will not be watching next year, or watching anything else that Joss does…ever.And the reason I will watch all the bad stuff, is that if it does indeed turn out bad, I want all my anger and rage and complete and utter disappointment to be at their pinnacle when I write to ME [This message has been edited by Warduke (edited March 21, 2002).] IP: Logged | Popje Cool Monster Fighter
Posts: 182 Registered: Sep 2000 | posted March 21, 2002 15:35 My sentiments are shared! Why pick on W/T? Seems almost like a ratings grab. First they have sex then one of them dies and the other goes mad. As others have pointed out it seems “So cliché!” Can this be the BtVS we love so much? My judgement of S6 is it’s been a lackluster season. Lots of mopey characterizations (with exception of Tara and Anya funnily enough) - I mean can Buffy, Dawn, Xander, Spike and Willow get any more whiney? And they’re sitting around. And sitting around. After 14 eps they can’t find a couple of geeks for crying out loud. This is the team that hunted down the Mayor and the Master as teenagers? The show has not set up any major chills or thrills or laughs for me this year. The only ep, carrying the fire and energy was the musical and maybe Tabula Rasa. And well, one of those was a Joss ep. And so after a fairly blaise sense of conflict, drama and action, we get the writers targeting our fave couple (after watching them separated for most of the year) for a major explosion. It seems like rabbit out of the hat drama to me. Well that’s my rant for the day.
IP: Logged | Sela Cool Monster Fighter
Posts: 159 Registered: Jan 2002 | posted March 21, 2002 15:36 Well, if Joss wanted to get back at all the spoiled people, he'd pretty much have to screw every character...oh, wait...No, seriously, I don't think this is retaliation for spoilers. Joss has a different mentality when it comes to fans. He doesn't resent us. If anything, he recognizes that it's the fans that keep his machine running. If he was that petty, then I wouldn't watch the show. I keep hearing how Joss likes to make characters indispensible and then he offs them, but it seems like an odd description to me. He's killed Jenny, Kendra and Joyce. But that's really it. I don't see these first two characters as being indispensible. Jenny hadn't been given time to really grow and to be widely accepted as a member of the Scoobies. Kendra, well, three or four episodes does not a Scooby make. As for Joyce--well, that one was much more plot driven than anything else. Joss always knew he was going to kill her off, but he had to wait until the characters were the most vulnerable. The killing of a character has never ever been this gratuitous, graphic, and really nonsensical IMO. --Sela [This message has been edited by Sela (edited March 21, 2002).] IP: Logged | Dr.G Lesbian Gay Type Lover
Posts: 4561 Registered: Jan 2001 | posted March 21, 2002 15:36 JustSomeGuy, about Beauty and the Beast, I remember reading an interview with Ron Perlman in which he stated that Linda Hamilton wanted to leave the show because she was pregnant and wanted to spend more time with her family. Still killing her off was equal to killing the show.As for Joss Whedon, I've always gotten the impression that he does not really care what others (people not part of his staff I mean) think. I mean I am sure he cares, but to a degree, I cannot believe he would screw up his best creation to get back at anybody. At Nocturnal during his talk he was jokingly talking about how he had thought that introducing Dawn as the younger sister would be original, only to hear everybody tell him that that has been done in every other soap on the planet or something. Not sure if he meant that, his sarcasm can be difficult to interpret at times. Heh. He has always managed to be very original even when introducing old cliches. I don't think this is happening to punish anybody or to please anybody for that matter. But if this is how it ends I will not forgive, and I will not watch it. There really is no excuse that justifies pleasing the people this scenario will please. Hmmph, as for your last question. No. It is not too much to ask. [This message has been edited by Dr.G (edited March 21, 2002).] IP: Logged | BBOvenGuy Strong like an Amazon
Posts: 3611 Registered: Sep 2000 | posted March 21, 2002 15:37 Well, that's the thing, Brian. I can't let myself get too angry because it'll interfere with my own writing. I reached this conclusion after I was completely unable to do any story-planning yesterday because I kept checking the board to see if there was any new news. Bailing out early is pretty much a self-defense mechanism.IP: Logged | Perfume V Floating Rose
Posts: 32 Registered: Mar 2002 | posted March 21, 2002 15:37 Does anyone think that the 'ambiguous' ending to 'Normal Again' contained a strong hint that this could be reset by the end of the season? After all, if this season is only happening inside an insane girl's mind (Buffy, not Marti ) anything's possible...IP: Logged | Web Warlock Sassy Eggs
Posts: 506 Registered: Oct 2001 | posted March 21, 2002 15:37 Exactly.If want this kind of pain on TV, I'll watch CNN. I won't touch another thing that Joss or Marti do on TV if this stays bad. I'll watch Amber and Aly in anything. But I don't have to take this crap. My wife absolutly detests "Ally McBeal" since they killed of Billy. If they keep Tara dead, I won't need to convince her not to watch. And she is the one who got me to watch all of Voyager! So ME, if you have your little spies out there reading this, take notes. This is how you shoot yourself in the foot. You have given me some great characters and stories, but I don't have to take this. I'll support other fans by reading fan fics, or playing the RPG game with Tara still alive. Show that you are smarter than the David Kellys, JMSs and Chris Carters out there. Speaking of the RPG. I don't know how it is with most license holders, but Fox, ME and Joss already got their money. Not buying some products hurts that manufacture and not ME, Fox. So yes, I plan to buy all of the Buffy RPG books this summer, not because of ME, but because it would hurt the guys and gals at Eden even more. Warlock ------------------ Web Warlock web.warlock@attbi.com webwarlock@planetadnd.com Author, the Netbooks of Witches and Warlocks The Other Side: http://www.xtreme-gaming.com/theotherside/ Shadow Earth Games: http://www.rpghost.com/WebWarlock/ The FanCC: http://www.enworld.org/fancc/ -- Jesus saves. Allah forgives. Buddha shows the light. Cthulhu thinks you'd make a nice sandwich. IP: Logged | mariacomet Cool Monster Fighter
Posts: 225 Registered: Nov 2001 | posted March 21, 2002 15:39 quote: Originally posted by JustSomeGuy: For me, it just keeps on coming back to this: why? Why would Marti do this? Why would Joss let her? What the hell are they thinking? What if Joss is doing this to "get back" at us for all the spoiler nonsense?....maybe loss of viewers are'nt really a concern to Joss on this.. I mean, 7 *is* the last season..
There are a lot of reasons I could come up with for why. Though most are rationalizations. I can even think of some positive rationalizations. like...maybe Joss is doing this to 'get back at' the gay person dies stereotype, assuming that he makes it okay in the end.
I agree that this season has had little in the way of hope or joy. And I can't take much more. Still, I want to give Joss and ME a chance to turn it all around. I want to believe there is some master plan here and that Joss does in fact know what he is doing, and what he is putting the fans through. I have seen what you are describing though, a number of times. The writers suddenly begin to think they are smarter then the fans. Good writers of a show assume that the fans don't really know what they want. Which is true, to an extent. Like on the show 'Moonlighting' we liked the dance of sexual tension, and we wanted the leads to get together. But we also didn't want them to get together because the dance of sexual tension would end. We WANT Tara and Willow to be happy. But then again, love depends on dealing with strife and that IS what Buffy is all about. How long would we all watch if everything was happy and cheery? The problem is that the writers have gone to the other extreme. They aren't really giving ANY of us what we want. not even a little. Joss may have gotten to the point where he believes he knows better than we do. That his 'creative license' is more important then the fans. I don't know. I hope not. But he has to care about writing because Firefly is NOT a success yet and UPN MAY want more of Buffy IF the ratings keep up. May I point out that most everything Rob Tabert has done since Xena has failed miserably?
IP: Logged | Cajjy Blessed Wannabe
Posts: 4 Registered: Mar 2002 | posted March 21, 2002 15:49 Question I pulled this straight from the spoilers on AnGelX's website, whom I think all agree is a consistent source of reliable information."Although initially, she does a very good deed, she is later blinded by the desire for vengeance. No one (and as you'll see, nothing) is able to stop her." This of course is referring to Willow going ballistic after finding Tara's body. My question is, what could be this "very good deed" be? Please don't tell me it is tracking down Warren and killing him in cold blood. It cant be bringing Tara back from the dead either, because every thing we have been presented lead us to believe that she doesn't. God, this is killing me. I don't ever remember being this nervous about a series finale before. Here's hoping for a happy ending! (And yes Joss my only definition of a happy ending is to see an alive Tara running into Willow's arms as the credits roll!) IP: Logged | wiccie Sassy Eggs
Posts: 720 Registered: Jan 2001 | posted March 21, 2002 15:49 Backing up Garfield, yeah the B&B sitch was because LH wanted to be mom. Another bit of Lesbo trivia, the actress (Jo Andersen, I think) who replaced Linda played the "surviving" lesbian on "Northern Exposure". If this is indeed a train wreck and not a self-contained rollercoaster ride, I'll be the first to throw mud on Joss. I still believe this will be OK in the long run, though. To each their own.
Oh, and I hope to get a plushy Cthulhu doll for my birthday. IP: Logged | Cici Willowhand
Posts: 351 Registered: Feb 2001 | posted March 21, 2002 15:50 quote: Originally posted by Wiccagrrl: Cici, yeah, I guess we'll see. We know we get a fairly passionate kiss in ep 18. (See first post) We know Amber mentioned a naked (well, with modesty clothing) bed scene. How much we see on screen, we'll see, but the implication seems to be make-up sex. Considering Tara gets killed shortly after the make-up, I actually wouldn't be a bit surprised if we did get an actual love scene. Y'know, just so we get the highest highs and the lowest lows. Or maybe the actual love scene will wait until they bring Tara back (thinking positively here)
"passionate kiss" ? Like Jessie and Katie? *g* Oh my God! I sooooo hope for a lovescene. A little skin here and there *g* I try to think positiv too, and i know "nobody is really dead in Joss´ World" For example Jenny and Joyce...... IP: Logged | BBOvenGuy Strong like an Amazon
Posts: 3611 Registered: Sep 2000 | posted March 21, 2002 15:56 quote: Originally posted by Cajjy: My question is, what could be this "very good deed" be? Please don't tell me it is tracking down Warren and killing him in cold blood. It cant be bringing Tara back from the dead either, because every thing we have been presented lead us to believe that she doesn't.
If I remember what I've been told correctly, Buffy also gets shot and Willow manages to save her with magic. Someone with more knowledge may come along to correct me, though. IP: Logged | Warduke Strong like an Amazon
Posts: 2862 Registered: Nov 2000 | posted March 21, 2002 15:57 quote: Originally posted by BBOvenGuy: Well, that's the thing, Brian. I can't let myself get too angry because it'll interfere with my own writing. I reached this conclusion after I was completely unable to do any story-planning yesterday because I kept checking the board to see if there was any new news. Bailing out early is pretty much a self-defense mechanism.
Oh I completely understand Bob, I would advise most Kittens who will take this very badly to do like you and just not watch it but for me, I want all that anger and rage to be at a boil if the worst comes to pass, but that’s not a good thing for most people, I just happen to thrive on it, but most people shouldn’t watch if it does turn out bad. IP: Logged | [This message has been edited by Warduke (edited March 21, 2002).] IP: LoggedPopjeCool Monster Fighter
Posts: 182 Registered: Sep 2000 posted March 21, 2002 15:35 My sentiments are shared! Why pick on W/T? Seems almost like a ratings grab. First they have sex then one of them dies and the other goes mad. As others have pointed out it seems “So cliché!” Can this be the BtVS we love so much? My judgement of S6 is it’s been a lackluster season. Lots of mopey characterizations (with exception of Tara and Anya funnily enough) - I mean can Buffy, Dawn, Xander, Spike and Willow get any more whiney? And they’re sitting around. And sitting around. After 14 eps they can’t find a couple of geeks for crying out loud. This is the team that hunted down the Mayor and the Master as teenagers? The show has not set up any major chills or thrills or laughs for me this year. The only ep, carrying the fire and energy was the musical and maybe Tabula Rasa. And well, one of those was a Joss ep. And so after a fairly blaise sense of conflict, drama and action, we get the writers targeting our fave couple (after watching them separated for most of the year) for a major explosion. It seems like rabbit out of the hat drama to me. Well that’s my rant for the day.
IP: Logged posted March 21, 2002 15:35 My sentiments are shared! Why pick on W/T? Seems almost like a ratings grab. First they have sex then one of them dies and the other goes mad. As others have pointed out it seems “So cliché!” Can this be the BtVS we love so much? My judgement of S6 is it’s been a lackluster season. Lots of mopey characterizations (with exception of Tara and Anya funnily enough) - I mean can Buffy, Dawn, Xander, Spike and Willow get any more whiney? And they’re sitting around. And sitting around. After 14 eps they can’t find a couple of geeks for crying out loud. This is the team that hunted down the Mayor and the Master as teenagers? The show has not set up any major chills or thrills or laughs for me this year. The only ep, carrying the fire and energy was the musical and maybe Tabula Rasa. And well, one of those was a Joss ep. And so after a fairly blaise sense of conflict, drama and action, we get the writers targeting our fave couple (after watching them separated for most of the year) for a major explosion. It seems like rabbit out of the hat drama to me. Well that’s my rant for the day. IP: LoggedSelaCool Monster Fighter
Posts: 159 Registered: Jan 2002 posted March 21, 2002 15:36 Well, if Joss wanted to get back at all the spoiled people, he'd pretty much have to screw every character...oh, wait...No, seriously, I don't think this is retaliation for spoilers. Joss has a different mentality when it comes to fans. He doesn't resent us. If anything, he recognizes that it's the fans that keep his machine running. If he was that petty, then I wouldn't watch the show. I keep hearing how Joss likes to make characters indispensible and then he offs them, but it seems like an odd description to me. He's killed Jenny, Kendra and Joyce. But that's really it. I don't see these first two characters as being indispensible. Jenny hadn't been given time to really grow and to be widely accepted as a member of the Scoobies. Kendra, well, three or four episodes does not a Scooby make. As for Joyce--well, that one was much more plot driven than anything else. Joss always knew he was going to kill her off, but he had to wait until the characters were the most vulnerable. The killing of a character has never ever been this gratuitous, graphic, and really nonsensical IMO. --Sela [This message has been edited by Sela (edited March 21, 2002).] IP: Logged posted March 21, 2002 15:36 Well, if Joss wanted to get back at all the spoiled people, he'd pretty much have to screw every character...oh, wait...No, seriously, I don't think this is retaliation for spoilers. Joss has a different mentality when it comes to fans. He doesn't resent us. If anything, he recognizes that it's the fans that keep his machine running. If he was that petty, then I wouldn't watch the show. I keep hearing how Joss likes to make characters indispensible and then he offs them, but it seems like an odd description to me. He's killed Jenny, Kendra and Joyce. But that's really it. I don't see these first two characters as being indispensible. Jenny hadn't been given time to really grow and to be widely accepted as a member of the Scoobies. Kendra, well, three or four episodes does not a Scooby make. As for Joyce--well, that one was much more plot driven than anything else. Joss always knew he was going to kill her off, but he had to wait until the characters were the most vulnerable. The killing of a character has never ever been this gratuitous, graphic, and really nonsensical IMO. --Sela [This message has been edited by Sela (edited March 21, 2002).] IP: LoggedDr.GLesbian Gay Type Lover
Posts: 4561 Registered: Jan 2001 posted March 21, 2002 15:36 JustSomeGuy, about Beauty and the Beast, I remember reading an interview with Ron Perlman in which he stated that Linda Hamilton wanted to leave the show because she was pregnant and wanted to spend more time with her family. Still killing her off was equal to killing the show.As for Joss Whedon, I've always gotten the impression that he does not really care what others (people not part of his staff I mean) think. I mean I am sure he cares, but to a degree, I cannot believe he would screw up his best creation to get back at anybody. At Nocturnal during his talk he was jokingly talking about how he had thought that introducing Dawn as the younger sister would be original, only to hear everybody tell him that that has been done in every other soap on the planet or something. Not sure if he meant that, his sarcasm can be difficult to interpret at times. Heh. He has always managed to be very original even when introducing old cliches. I don't think this is happening to punish anybody or to please anybody for that matter. But if this is how it ends I will not forgive, and I will not watch it. There really is no excuse that justifies pleasing the people this scenario will please. Hmmph, as for your last question. No. It is not too much to ask. [This message has been edited by Dr.G (edited March 21, 2002).] IP: Logged posted March 21, 2002 15:36 JustSomeGuy, about Beauty and the Beast, I remember reading an interview with Ron Perlman in which he stated that Linda Hamilton wanted to leave the show because she was pregnant and wanted to spend more time with her family. Still killing her off was equal to killing the show.As for Joss Whedon, I've always gotten the impression that he does not really care what others (people not part of his staff I mean) think. I mean I am sure he cares, but to a degree, I cannot believe he would screw up his best creation to get back at anybody. At Nocturnal during his talk he was jokingly talking about how he had thought that introducing Dawn as the younger sister would be original, only to hear everybody tell him that that has been done in every other soap on the planet or something. Not sure if he meant that, his sarcasm can be difficult to interpret at times. Heh. He has always managed to be very original even when introducing old cliches. I don't think this is happening to punish anybody or to please anybody for that matter. But if this is how it ends I will not forgive, and I will not watch it. There really is no excuse that justifies pleasing the people this scenario will please. Hmmph, as for your last question. No. It is not too much to ask. [This message has been edited by Dr.G (edited March 21, 2002).] IP: LoggedBBOvenGuyStrong like an Amazon
Posts: 3611 Registered: Sep 2000 posted March 21, 2002 15:37 Well, that's the thing, Brian. I can't let myself get too angry because it'll interfere with my own writing. I reached this conclusion after I was completely unable to do any story-planning yesterday because I kept checking the board to see if there was any new news. Bailing out early is pretty much a self-defense mechanism.IP: Logged posted March 21, 2002 15:37 Well, that's the thing, Brian. I can't let myself get too angry because it'll interfere with my own writing. I reached this conclusion after I was completely unable to do any story-planning yesterday because I kept checking the board to see if there was any new news. Bailing out early is pretty much a self-defense mechanism.IP: LoggedPerfume VFloating Rose
Posts: 32 Registered: Mar 2002 posted March 21, 2002 15:37 Does anyone think that the 'ambiguous' ending to 'Normal Again' contained a strong hint that this could be reset by the end of the season? After all, if this season is only happening inside an insane girl's mind (Buffy, not Marti ) anything's possible...IP: Logged posted March 21, 2002 15:37 Does anyone think that the 'ambiguous' ending to 'Normal Again' contained a strong hint that this could be reset by the end of the season? After all, if this season is only happening inside an insane girl's mind (Buffy, not Marti ) anything's possible...IP: LoggedWeb WarlockSassy Eggs
Posts: 506 Registered: Oct 2001 posted March 21, 2002 15:37 Exactly.If want this kind of pain on TV, I'll watch CNN. I won't touch another thing that Joss or Marti do on TV if this stays bad. I'll watch Amber and Aly in anything. But I don't have to take this crap. My wife absolutly detests "Ally McBeal" since they killed of Billy. If they keep Tara dead, I won't need to convince her not to watch. And she is the one who got me to watch all of Voyager! So ME, if you have your little spies out there reading this, take notes. This is how you shoot yourself in the foot. You have given me some great characters and stories, but I don't have to take this. I'll support other fans by reading fan fics, or playing the RPG game with Tara still alive. Show that you are smarter than the David Kellys, JMSs and Chris Carters out there. Speaking of the RPG. I don't know how it is with most license holders, but Fox, ME and Joss already got their money. Not buying some products hurts that manufacture and not ME, Fox. So yes, I plan to buy all of the Buffy RPG books this summer, not because of ME, but because it would hurt the guys and gals at Eden even more. Warlock ------------------ Web Warlock web.warlock@attbi.com webwarlock@planetadnd.com Author, the Netbooks of Witches and Warlocks The Other Side: http://www.xtreme-gaming.com/theotherside/ Shadow Earth Games: http://www.rpghost.com/WebWarlock/ The FanCC: http://www.enworld.org/fancc/ -- Jesus saves. Allah forgives. Buddha shows the light. Cthulhu thinks you'd make a nice sandwich. IP: Logged posted March 21, 2002 15:37 Exactly.If want this kind of pain on TV, I'll watch CNN. I won't touch another thing that Joss or Marti do on TV if this stays bad. I'll watch Amber and Aly in anything. But I don't have to take this crap. My wife absolutly detests "Ally McBeal" since they killed of Billy. If they keep Tara dead, I won't need to convince her not to watch. And she is the one who got me to watch all of Voyager! So ME, if you have your little spies out there reading this, take notes. This is how you shoot yourself in the foot. You have given me some great characters and stories, but I don't have to take this. I'll support other fans by reading fan fics, or playing the RPG game with Tara still alive. Show that you are smarter than the David Kellys, JMSs and Chris Carters out there. Speaking of the RPG. I don't know how it is with most license holders, but Fox, ME and Joss already got their money. Not buying some products hurts that manufacture and not ME, Fox. So yes, I plan to buy all of the Buffy RPG books this summer, not because of ME, but because it would hurt the guys and gals at Eden even more. Warlock ------------------ Web Warlock web.warlock@attbi.com webwarlock@planetadnd.com Author, the Netbooks of Witches and Warlocks The Other Side: http://www.xtreme-gaming.com/theotherside/ Shadow Earth Games: http://www.rpghost.com/WebWarlock/ The FanCC: http://www.enworld.org/fancc/ -- Jesus saves. Allah forgives. Buddha shows the light. Cthulhu thinks you'd make a nice sandwich. IP: LoggedmariacometCool Monster Fighter
Posts: 225 Registered: Nov 2001 posted March 21, 2002 15:39 quote: Originally posted by JustSomeGuy: For me, it just keeps on coming back to this: why? Why would Marti do this? Why would Joss let her? What the hell are they thinking? What if Joss is doing this to "get back" at us for all the spoiler nonsense?....maybe loss of viewers are'nt really a concern to Joss on this.. I mean, 7 *is* the last season..
There are a lot of reasons I could come up with for why. Though most are rationalizations. I can even think of some positive rationalizations. like...maybe Joss is doing this to 'get back at' the gay person dies stereotype, assuming that he makes it okay in the end.
I agree that this season has had little in the way of hope or joy. And I can't take much more. Still, I want to give Joss and ME a chance to turn it all around. I want to believe there is some master plan here and that Joss does in fact know what he is doing, and what he is putting the fans through. I have seen what you are describing though, a number of times. The writers suddenly begin to think they are smarter then the fans. Good writers of a show assume that the fans don't really know what they want. Which is true, to an extent. Like on the show 'Moonlighting' we liked the dance of sexual tension, and we wanted the leads to get together. But we also didn't want them to get together because the dance of sexual tension would end. We WANT Tara and Willow to be happy. But then again, love depends on dealing with strife and that IS what Buffy is all about. How long would we all watch if everything was happy and cheery? The problem is that the writers have gone to the other extreme. They aren't really giving ANY of us what we want. not even a little. Joss may have gotten to the point where he believes he knows better than we do. That his 'creative license' is more important then the fans. I don't know. I hope not. But he has to care about writing because Firefly is NOT a success yet and UPN MAY want more of Buffy IF the ratings keep up. May I point out that most everything Rob Tabert has done since Xena has failed miserably?
IP: Logged posted March 21, 2002 15:39 quote: Originally posted by JustSomeGuy: For me, it just keeps on coming back to this: why? Why would Marti do this? Why would Joss let her? What the hell are they thinking? What if Joss is doing this to "get back" at us for all the spoiler nonsense?....maybe loss of viewers are'nt really a concern to Joss on this.. I mean, 7 *is* the last season..
There are a lot of reasons I could come up with for why. Though most are rationalizations. I can even think of some positive rationalizations. like...maybe Joss is doing this to 'get back at' the gay person dies stereotype, assuming that he makes it okay in the end.
I agree that this season has had little in the way of hope or joy. And I can't take much more. Still, I want to give Joss and ME a chance to turn it all around. I want to believe there is some master plan here and that Joss does in fact know what he is doing, and what he is putting the fans through. I have seen what you are describing though, a number of times. The writers suddenly begin to think they are smarter then the fans. Good writers of a show assume that the fans don't really know what they want. Which is true, to an extent. Like on the show 'Moonlighting' we liked the dance of sexual tension, and we wanted the leads to get together. But we also didn't want them to get together because the dance of sexual tension would end. We WANT Tara and Willow to be happy. But then again, love depends on dealing with strife and that IS what Buffy is all about. How long would we all watch if everything was happy and cheery? The problem is that the writers have gone to the other extreme. They aren't really giving ANY of us what we want. not even a little. Joss may have gotten to the point where he believes he knows better than we do. That his 'creative license' is more important then the fans. I don't know. I hope not. But he has to care about writing because Firefly is NOT a success yet and UPN MAY want more of Buffy IF the ratings keep up. May I point out that most everything Rob Tabert has done since Xena has failed miserably?
quote:IP: LoggedCajjyBlessed Wannabe
Posts: 4 Registered: Mar 2002 posted March 21, 2002 15:49 Question I pulled this straight from the spoilers on AnGelX's website, whom I think all agree is a consistent source of reliable information."Although initially, she does a very good deed, she is later blinded by the desire for vengeance. No one (and as you'll see, nothing) is able to stop her." This of course is referring to Willow going ballistic after finding Tara's body. My question is, what could be this "very good deed" be? Please don't tell me it is tracking down Warren and killing him in cold blood. It cant be bringing Tara back from the dead either, because every thing we have been presented lead us to believe that she doesn't. God, this is killing me. I don't ever remember being this nervous about a series finale before. Here's hoping for a happy ending! (And yes Joss my only definition of a happy ending is to see an alive Tara running into Willow's arms as the credits roll!) IP: Logged posted March 21, 2002 15:49 Question I pulled this straight from the spoilers on AnGelX's website, whom I think all agree is a consistent source of reliable information."Although initially, she does a very good deed, she is later blinded by the desire for vengeance. No one (and as you'll see, nothing) is able to stop her." This of course is referring to Willow going ballistic after finding Tara's body. My question is, what could be this "very good deed" be? Please don't tell me it is tracking down Warren and killing him in cold blood. It cant be bringing Tara back from the dead either, because every thing we have been presented lead us to believe that she doesn't. God, this is killing me. I don't ever remember being this nervous about a series finale before. Here's hoping for a happy ending! (And yes Joss my only definition of a happy ending is to see an alive Tara running into Willow's arms as the credits roll!) IP: LoggedwiccieSassy Eggs
Posts: 720 Registered: Jan 2001 posted March 21, 2002 15:49 Backing up Garfield, yeah the B&B sitch was because LH wanted to be mom. Another bit of Lesbo trivia, the actress (Jo Andersen, I think) who replaced Linda played the "surviving" lesbian on "Northern Exposure". If this is indeed a train wreck and not a self-contained rollercoaster ride, I'll be the first to throw mud on Joss. I still believe this will be OK in the long run, though. To each their own.
Oh, and I hope to get a plushy Cthulhu doll for my birthday. IP: Logged posted March 21, 2002 15:49 Backing up Garfield, yeah the B&B sitch was because LH wanted to be mom. Another bit of Lesbo trivia, the actress (Jo Andersen, I think) who replaced Linda played the "surviving" lesbian on "Northern Exposure". If this is indeed a train wreck and not a self-contained rollercoaster ride, I'll be the first to throw mud on Joss. I still believe this will be OK in the long run, though. To each their own.
Oh, and I hope to get a plushy Cthulhu doll for my birthday. IP: LoggedCiciWillowhand
Posts: 351 Registered: Feb 2001 posted March 21, 2002 15:50 quote: Originally posted by Wiccagrrl: Cici, yeah, I guess we'll see. We know we get a fairly passionate kiss in ep 18. (See first post) We know Amber mentioned a naked (well, with modesty clothing) bed scene. How much we see on screen, we'll see, but the implication seems to be make-up sex. Considering Tara gets killed shortly after the make-up, I actually wouldn't be a bit surprised if we did get an actual love scene. Y'know, just so we get the highest highs and the lowest lows. Or maybe the actual love scene will wait until they bring Tara back (thinking positively here)
"passionate kiss" ? Like Jessie and Katie? *g* Oh my God! I sooooo hope for a lovescene. A little skin here and there *g* I try to think positiv too, and i know "nobody is really dead in Joss´ World" For example Jenny and Joyce...... IP: Logged posted March 21, 2002 15:50 quote: Originally posted by Wiccagrrl: Cici, yeah, I guess we'll see. We know we get a fairly passionate kiss in ep 18. (See first post) We know Amber mentioned a naked (well, with modesty clothing) bed scene. How much we see on screen, we'll see, but the implication seems to be make-up sex. Considering Tara gets killed shortly after the make-up, I actually wouldn't be a bit surprised if we did get an actual love scene. Y'know, just so we get the highest highs and the lowest lows. Or maybe the actual love scene will wait until they bring Tara back (thinking positively here)
"passionate kiss" ? Like Jessie and Katie? *g* Oh my God! I sooooo hope for a lovescene. A little skin here and there *g* I try to think positiv too, and i know "nobody is really dead in Joss´ World" For example Jenny and Joyce...... quote:IP: LoggedBBOvenGuyStrong like an Amazon
Posts: 3611 Registered: Sep 2000 posted March 21, 2002 15:56 quote: Originally posted by Cajjy: My question is, what could be this "very good deed" be? Please don't tell me it is tracking down Warren and killing him in cold blood. It cant be bringing Tara back from the dead either, because every thing we have been presented lead us to believe that she doesn't.
If I remember what I've been told correctly, Buffy also gets shot and Willow manages to save her with magic. Someone with more knowledge may come along to correct me, though. IP: Logged posted March 21, 2002 15:56 quote: Originally posted by Cajjy: My question is, what could be this "very good deed" be? Please don't tell me it is tracking down Warren and killing him in cold blood. It cant be bringing Tara back from the dead either, because every thing we have been presented lead us to believe that she doesn't.
If I remember what I've been told correctly, Buffy also gets shot and Willow manages to save her with magic. Someone with more knowledge may come along to correct me, though. quote:IP: LoggedWardukeStrong like an Amazon
Posts: 2862 Registered: Nov 2000 posted March 21, 2002 15:57 quote: Originally posted by BBOvenGuy: Well, that's the thing, Brian. I can't let myself get too angry because it'll interfere with my own writing. I reached this conclusion after I was completely unable to do any story-planning yesterday because I kept checking the board to see if there was any new news. Bailing out early is pretty much a self-defense mechanism.
Oh I completely understand Bob, I would advise most Kittens who will take this very badly to do like you and just not watch it but for me, I want all that anger and rage to be at a boil if the worst comes to pass, but that’s not a good thing for most people, I just happen to thrive on it, but most people shouldn’t watch if it does turn out bad. IP: Logged posted March 21, 2002 15:57 quote: Originally posted by BBOvenGuy: Well, that's the thing, Brian. I can't let myself get too angry because it'll interfere with my own writing. I reached this conclusion after I was completely unable to do any story-planning yesterday because I kept checking the board to see if there was any new news. Bailing out early is pretty much a self-defense mechanism.
Oh I completely understand Bob, I would advise most Kittens who will take this very badly to do like you and just not watch it but for me, I want all that anger and rage to be at a boil if the worst comes to pass, but that’s not a good thing for most people, I just happen to thrive on it, but most people shouldn’t watch if it does turn out bad. quote:
|