Well, I haven't poked my nose in a developing thread yet - I've just been checking out the more general writing threads, but I was curious about how these things worked, so here I am.
I realize the original post is almost a year old, and that you've moved on to other things and shelved this - and that you didn't have a plot in mind when you wrote this, so it might not go anywhere. That said, I definitely think this is worth commenting on.
So, to start - I really, really liked this. Overall, it gave me a feeling of ... not exactly loneliness, but solitude with a hint of longing. Maybe I'm overthinking (gosh, when does >that< ever happen?), but I think of loneliness as going hand-in-hand with depression or sadness, but this bit didn't give off any sad vibes ... it was more like a sense of waiting. Like, the longing for an end to solitude is combined with a quiet faith that it >will< end, and this faith keeps any bad feelings away and allows for an enjoyment of the quiet times.
There was also a sense of anticipation - not necessarily on Tara's part, but on Willow's. She walks by every day, and she looks at Tara and she wonders these things ... and the obvious solution is to go talk to her, but Willow doesn't. On one level, Willow does tend to be a little shy with new people, but on another, she's a puzzle-solver, so just walking up and talking to Tara is like checking the answers in the back of the book before going through the process of solving the problem.
I agree with Trom in that it's a great snapshot, and a great start to something longer. But, being a year old, that might not necessarily be something you're interested in doing - but I hope you are, because, again, I really liked this.
I agree and disagree with Trom regarding switching this all to Willow's point of view, and showing rather than telling. This is something of a ... well, not a pet peeve, but something that I've thought about a lot. I feel there are two distinct broad styles of writing third person, showing and telling, and that neither is actually better than the other. Most English classes or creative writing types will stress showing instead of telling, because showing is thought of as being superior, but I disagree.
Showing is more "in the moment" and, as such, tends to be more engaging to the reader. Telling is, however, just as valid. It creates a sense of a "narrator", as if what is being read is a transcript of what someone is saying out loud as they are telling a story. Fairy tales that start with "Once Upon A Time ..." tend to be telling. 'The Chronicles of Narnia' by C.S. Lewis is telling. As such - for me, at least ... and this might be just me - a 'telling' kind of writing styles gives me a sense of magic and wonder, like I'm hearing someone tell me a story, and that absolutely anything can happen in it.
Showing is more 'real', but if you're writing something "fantastic" - in the 'fantasy' sense - why not use the more old-fashioned 'telling' style of writing?
But, more specifically as applies to this bit, I'm torn. I think it really depends on where you would want to go with this. I feel the 'telling' style that you have here kind of says "Here we go - this is a wondrous tale of love!" The 'telling' style seems to slip a bit, though, when Willow gets a name. Weird, huh?
Let me back up ... the opening of the story, with the broad description of a place, is like the cinematic equivalent of a wide-wide shot that pans in until we see Tara. There's a sense there that the world is very, very big, and that Tara is very, very small, but there is a significance in the small things (because, really ... why would the camera pan in on something insignificant?). There's a sense that, in a big wide world, we're about to see something that may not be important in the grand scheme of humanity, but is going to change this one life (two, when Willow gets introduced).
That said, I think Trom is correct. Or incorrect. Depending on what you want to do. Dipping into Willow's head just a little kind of breaks the feeling that the reader is watching a story unfold - because we don't get into Tara's head at all, it kind of brings up the question of why our esteemed narrator knows what's going on in Willow's head, but doesn't know what's going on in Tara's ... if that makes any sense. Like this narrator should know everything, or should only know what he/she/it can "see".
Basically, I'd think that this either needs to be switched to Willow's POV like Trom suggests, or it needs to back off from Willow's thoughts and just be a snapshot of Tara sketching and Willow walking by, looking.
While I am a strong proponent of the 'telling' style, I have to admit, it only works for certain kinds of stories, and works best for prologue/epilogue bookends to a 'showing' story.
I think part of what I like about this, as-is, is that it leaves the reader with many questions - not the least of which is "what's the setting?" With the physical description of the surroundings, this could be modern day, any historical period in which easels existed, or a fantasy-genre story (and, really, the 'telling' style gives me a sense of the latter).
One last comment ... just something random that popped into my head: maybe Tara isn't sketching the birds. Maybe she stops and looks at them when they fly because she envies their freedom.
So - thank you for writing this. IThe "what does this make you think of?" request was awesome, and I really enjoyed commenting on it.
-Sass
|