--
"Omnia mutantur, nihil interit." -- "Everything changes, but nothing is truly lost."
"The holy passion of friendship is of so sweet and steady and loyal and enduring a nature that it will last for a whole lifetime, if not asked to lend money."
--Mark Twain
Willow's potential jealousy over B/T's friendship as a source of the argument is an interesting thought, though I must admit I don't see this in the text. Willow is understandably puzzled with Buffy interrupting their geometry session with Dawn, especially as Willow's encouragement is more likely to restore Dawn's enthusiasm about school (remember what she wrote about Willow in her journal?) than Buffy's buckle-down approach. However, Willow doesn't know about Buffy's potential for losing Dawn as Buffy hasn't told anyone but Giles.
Not long after this, the two had an argument about Willow’s magical use (in “Tough Love”). It’s interesting that this argument starts when Willow fears that Buffy and Tara will bond over the mutual experience of losing their mothers and that she will be excluded. (This is similar to Willow’s insecurity when Buffy began chumming around with Faith in season three.)
It might not have been Tara's intent, but she is quick to follow up on the subject, indicating that she does indeed have worries on that.
When Tara expresses concern about Willow’s increasing magical power, Willow quickly accuses Tara of doubting her orientation. This doesn’t seem to have been Tara’s intent at all, but Willow twists the argument in that direction. She adds an especially cruel jab about establishing her “lesbo street cred” before walking out on the conversation.
--
"Omnia mutantur, nihil interit." -- "Everything changes, but nothing is truly lost."
Out
Quote:
"a minute of perfection was worth the effort. A moment was the most you could ever expect from perfection."
--
"Omnia mutantur, nihil interit." -- "Everything changes, but nothing is truly lost."
BB:Hello Xander...and Anya, how is your money?!
A:Fine!Thank you for asking!
Quote:
Again we see no firm guidelines to when magic should be used and when it shouldn't. Obviously redecorating a room may be too whimsical, but then where is the line?
"The holy passion of friendship is of so sweet and steady and loyal and enduring a nature that it will last for a whole lifetime, if not asked to lend money."
--Mark Twain
--
"Omnia mutantur, nihil interit." -- "Everything changes, but nothing is truly lost."
Quote:
Again we see no firm guidelines to when magic should be used and when it shouldn't. Obviously redecorating a room may be too whimsical, but then where is the line?
-------------------------
Coffee, Food, Kisses and Gay Love........Get it while you are hot
--
"Omnia mutantur, nihil interit." -- "Everything changes, but nothing is truly lost."
Out Before Oz' actions in WAH and NMR, I would have agreed with your assessment of Oz, but after he kills Verucca and attacks Tara, I can't see him as a good person any longer. Oz isn't appropriate for Willow for many of the same reasons that Angel isn't good for Buffy.
I don't see symbolism in her choice, only love: Oz was a genuinely good person/werewolf, Willow just loved Tara more (inc. the girl-on-girl action!).
I find this idea interesting, and it makes sense since their early relationship was based on learning magic together. Perhaps Tara doubts that they would have enough in common if they lost this original core of their relationship.
Or was there anything else? Did Tara feel that Willow's ability, outstripping her own, were somehow taking Willow away from her? (A later parallel, perhaps, to Riley's fear about Buffy: "You're getting stronger and stronger, a little more out of reach").
It's much like trying to figure out how a new scientific advance fits into our ethics. It requires effort to find an appropriate analogy. I think Tara's spell to alter the Scoobies perceptions to not see demons is equivalent to Willow's spell to alter Tara's perception that they had an argument. Both spells alter perception to hide something which the caster is afraid will cause the others to reject her. However, one alters the past instead of the present and future, which is further out of our ordinary experience, and I suspect that difference is why many people are more upset by Willow's spell than Tara's.
Bah, I dunno: I'm just speculating here. Maybe because magic is so far removed from our everyday experiences (SR's "There was plenty of magic!" aside), it's hard to find a frame of reference to understand how it would fit into a ethical "Thou shalt/Thou shalt not" system.
--
"Omnia mutantur, nihil interit." -- "Everything changes, but nothing is truly lost."
--
"Omnia mutantur, nihil interit." -- "Everything changes, but nothing is truly lost."
sorry, don't throw rutten tomatoes on me pls
but it was mostly because of AH amazing act.. maid me go all
Quote:
So… NotWillow got high and got addicted to the magical equivalent of crack and realised she needed help within a day?
i hate that woman (Marti N.) hmmm.. makes u wonder, what if joss would've writtendirected this ep? probably wouldn't save it though..
Quote:
Voice-over: "I think this is about where we came in." Tyler: "Any last words?" "I still can't think of anything." Tyler: "Oh flashback humour, very funny." -- fight club
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests